[CCWG-ACCT] Concept of some form of "independent" member

Nigel Roberts nigel at channelisles.net
Fri Jul 17 11:23:38 UTC 2015


Then we have a terminology issue as that is not my understanding.

Can you take me to authority for your interpretation, please?

A legal person that is /not/ a natural person (i.e. a corporation, or 
other "juristic person".

This article seems to be of the same mind :-

http://www.publishyourarticles.net/knowledge-hub/law/what-are-the-differences-between-natural-person-and-legal-person/4209/



On 17/07/15 12:13, Gregory, Holly wrote:
> Natural persons (humans) are legal persons
>
>
>
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
> *
> *
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
> Nigel Roberts
> *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2015 05:51:22 AM
> *To:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Concept of some form of "independent" member
>
> Greg
>
> I think this is incorrect. I find it hard to imagine a corporation (and,
> particularly a non-profit corporation) which is required by law to
> restrict membership to legal persons in this way, that is to *require*
> members to be legal persons.
>
> I cannot believe US law is so fundamentally different here -- members of
> a corporation may normally be either natural persons or legal persons
> unless there are explicit restrictions in the Articles, which is a
> matter of choice, not compulsion.
>
> (I can imagine a non-profit CHOOSING to restrict membership to one or
> the other but I can't imagine any statutory requirement of this nature.)
>
> A trade association MIGHT restrict membership to legal persons: e.g. the
> Association of Incorporated Widget Makers (fictitious) may only allow
> incorporated makes of widgets; however it would be less unexpected to
> see non-profits expecting members to be natural persons only (e.g. the
> American Radio Relay League see http://www.arrl.org/arrl-by-laws).
>
> Can you expand on this please?
>
>
>
>
>
> On 17/07/15 09:47, Greg Shatan wrote:
>
>> hands of the community, and to have these powers as a matter of right.
>> Members must be legal persons.
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
> privileged or confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us
> immediately.
>
> ****************************************************************************************************
>



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list