[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Analysis of GAC Comments

Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
Fri Jul 17 12:19:08 UTC 2015

Dear all,

I realize that data interpretation is a very risky business, but I would advise to read answers to questions 1 to 5 in conjunction.

My personal feeling is that there is, first, overall agreement to keep the current advisory role to the Board, that, second, there is a what I personally see as a large plurality of opinions favoring an adaptation of the advisory role so as to be able to also advise the new community empowerment mechanism and, third, finally another plurality which favors a voting role of the GAC, with varying degrees of qualifications in their inputs.

Again, this is just my individual take of the responses, but I feel that at least we should strive to see the answers to the connected issues 1 to 5 as a whole.

Hope this is helpful

Jorge Cancio

Von: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Olga Cavalli
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 13:30
An: Bernard Turcotte
Cc: Accountability Cross Community
Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Analysis of GAC Comments

Dear Bernard,

Thanks for the summary.

I would like to make some comments and additions to your document:

- Question 2:
There is no reference in the summary about the request from governements that want to have a full balanced participation among all the stakeholders, with equal footing among them.

- Question 3:
There is no reference about the % of governments that want to be fully involved in the CEM (not ONLY  trough liaisons).
Argentina is one of them and there are others.

- Question 4:
There is no reference to % of governments that want to have a different role as only advisory.
Argentina is one of them and there are others.

- Question 5:
There is no reference to the % of governments that WANT to excercise community powers.
Argentina is one of them and there are others.

As representative of the Government of Argentina, I kindly ask you to include these other views into the summary.

Best regards

Olga Cavalli

2015-07-17 6:46 GMT-03:00 Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com<mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>>:

Per the co-chairs request please find attached the analysis of the GAC comments to the CCWG.



PS I will circulate the open format version later.

Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150717/9701fef6/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list