[CCWG-ACCT] Empowered SO/AC designators model - ARIN legal analysis
robin at ipjustice.org
Tue Jul 21 02:16:37 UTC 2015
I agree with Athina. It is important that we consider all the information as the stakes are too for us to jump to conclusions.
Thanks for forwarding the legal analysis.
On Jul 20, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Athina Fragkouli wrote:
> Dear Alan,
> These documents are shared as a reference. We are not proposing an
> alternative way forward from what was decided upon by the group. We
> merely want to make sure that all relevant information is shared.
> On 18/07/15 15:08, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>> Athina, are you forwarding this asking us to reconsider the Empowered
>> Designator model instead of the Single Member model I think the
>> Co-chairs declared as the preferred model earlier today?
>> At 18/07/2015 03:34 AM, Athina Fragkouli wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> I would like to forward you a legal analysis conducted for ARIN for your
>>> consideration and review.
>>> According to this analysis an empowered SO/AC designators model allows
>>> for SO/ACs to enforce their rights before courts.
>>> Thank you for your attention.
>>> Content-Type: application/pdf; name="ARIN_ Empowered Designators_
>>> Amendments for ICANN Articles and Bylaws.pdf"
>>> Content-Disposition: attachment;
>>> filename*0="ARIN_ Empowered Designators_ Proposed Amendments
>>> for ICANN A";
>>> filename*1="rticles and Bylaws.pdf"
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community