[CCWG-ACCT] Fundamental Bylaws paper for 21 July

[Grace Abuhamad]

Dear all, 

Here attached is an updated document for your consideration. I discussed
merging the Fundamental Bylaws parts of Sections 3 and 5 with Jordan, and he
give me the green light to suggest something. I¹ll note that he has not yet
reviewed the text. If possible, I¹d like to show you this on WP1 call today.

Thanks, 
Grace

From:  <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
Date:  Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 7:54 PM
To:  Accountability Cross Community
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject:  [CCWG-ACCT] Fundamental Bylaws paper for 21 July

Hi all 

Please see attached in .docx and .pdf an updated paper on Fundamental
Bylaws.

This paper accepted all the tracked changes from the version that was
available in Paris. I have received no comments on or off list for further
suggestions.

It then shows some tracked changes, which:

- row back on CWG inclusions to those the earlier version had (i.e. no ref
to PTI, or to the Separation review)

- adjustment of language to the voting threshold - 3/4 for Board as
previous, but proposing 3/4 for community mechanism (so it is symmetrical -
last draft had same as for board recall)

- some other minor grammar changes


Sorry this is late to the list, but the changes are very minor.

Jordan


On 18 July 2015 at 05:29, Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
> Hi all 
> 
> We also agreed we would discuss the updated Fundamental Bylaws part of the
> proposal by email. Please find the paper attached.
> 
> The changes are not significant but there is commentary on one significant
> issue.
> 
> - WP1 made a call to NOT include the locational requirements in the Articles
> or Bylaws as "Fundamental" - they would still be protected in the bylaws and
> Articles, and would be subject to the Standard Bylaws veto if a proposal to
> change that was ever made.
> 
> Other points:
> 
> - there is text to explain this more clearly, based on feedback in the
> comments and at meetings
> 
> - clarified (but may be too far) that the Separation review and PTI would be
> Fundamental Bylaws, as well as the CSC and IFR. (I think we need to take these
> back out.)
> 
> 
> Please read, discuss, etc.
> 
> 
> cheers
> Jordan
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150722/7aad5351/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Section3B_Fundamental Bylaws_22July_clean.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 35210 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150722/7aad5351/Section3B_FundamentalBylaws_22July_clean.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Section3B_Fundamental Bylaws_22July_redline.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 38273 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150722/7aad5351/Section3B_FundamentalBylaws_22July_redline.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Section3B_Fundamental Bylaws_22July_clean.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 654736 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150722/7aad5351/Section3B_FundamentalBylaws_22July_clean.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150722/7aad5351/smime.p7s>