[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] updated paper: Recall of the ICANN Board

Cherine Chalaby cherine.chalaby at icann.org
Thu Jul 23 18:23:12 UTC 2015


I agree. It does not make sense to ask NomCom to nominate alternates.   Cherine
> On 23 Jul 2015, at 15:23, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree with not asking the NomCom to put up alternates. Spilling the Board should be so exceptional and a smaller exe board should be able to then launch a process, which could result in both elections and in appointments.
> M
> 
> > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:13:13 +0100
> > From: malcolm at linx.net <mailto:malcolm at linx.net>
> > To: jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>; wp1 at icann.org <mailto:wp1 at icann.org>; accountability-cross-community at icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> > Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] updated paper: Recall of the ICANN Board
> > 
> > 
> > On 23/07/2015 11:18, Jordan Carter wrote:
> > > See my edits in the files beginning with 2015-07-23.
> > 
> > One comment: I thought the general view in Paris was that NomCom would
> > not nominate members of an interim Board. I doubt the practicality of
> > requiring it to do so.
> > 
> > That seems to have changed; perhaps I missed some discussion. Or
> > misperceived the general view.
> > 
> > Requiring NomCom to put up alternates at the AGM creates the "people
> > standing in the shadows waiting for a chance" that were mentioned as a
> > prospect to be avoided, and was accepted as a reason for not requiring
> > SOs and ACs to nominate alternates with every appointment.
> > 
> > Moreover, how will NomCom find people willing to commit to drop
> > everything and become an interim director in the unlikely event of a
> > Board spill, knowing that it is highly unlikely this will ever come to
> > pass?
> > 
> > It is surely much easier to ask someone "Will you agree to serve as a
> > director now?" than "Will you agree to serve as a director in an
> > unspecified number of months, should some very unlikely event come to
> > pass?".
> > 
> > For these reasons, I think that excusing NomCom from nominating interim
> > directors is a better choice.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
> > Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
> > London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ <http://publicaffairs.linx.net/>
> > 
> > London Internet Exchange Ltd
> > 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
> > 
> > Company Registered in England No. 3137929
> > Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150723/e32e8049/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list