[CCWG-ACCT] Bringing AoC Reviews into ICANN Bylaws, v5.4 reflecting Paris and new Non-Disclosure rule

Dr Eberhard W Lisse el at lisse.na
Fri Jul 24 08:44:15 UTC 2015

I personally don't agree with the minimalist approach, though I agree with tring to avoid overreach.

My view is more like: "Whatever it takes to get it right"

And in the context of transparency it means full disclosure unless quite specifically permitted not to disclose. Not the other way around.


Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6

> On Jul 24, 2015, at 08:54, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
> Why?
> That's like saying let's keep legislative changes to the minumum. It MAY be appropriate, but it may not.
> It's not an end in itself.
>> On 07/24/2015 07:44 AM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
>> .. Let's try to keep bylaw changes to a minimum.
>> Thomas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150724/0b564449/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list