[CCWG-ACCT] [CWG-Stewardship] Fwd: Meeting CWG requirements for IANA Budget - pls comment

[Kavouss Arasteh]

ear All
I did study the following which seems much better than uit was since the
IANA Budget is now separated
QUote

*"The IANA Budget (the PTI Budget) would be a separate Budget from the
ICANN budget.*
*The same community veto power would be available for the IANA Budget as
for the ICANN budget.*
*The threshold for a veto of the IANA Budget could be lower than is
proposed for the ICANN budget, due to its greater sensitivity.*
*Comment *
LOWER MEANS WHAT LEVEL ?
*If an IANA Budget was vetoed, because of the requirement for earlier
Budgeting, the issue would likely be resolved before the start of the
relevant financial year.*
*The caretaker proposal for the IANA Budget would be that if there had been
a community veto and it carried into the new financial year, funding would
continue at the same level*"
Pls kindly clarify the meaning of " LOWER"
Regards
Kavouss

2015-07-24 15:20 GMT+02:00 Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.na>:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Patrik,
>
> Thank you, this is helpful
>
> But what I actually want to say is that the 'basic' RZM operations
> must not become subject to a veto (as under current discussion
> within the CCWG) of an ICANN budget.
>
> I.e. there are IANA functions that may be used as leverage against
> ICANN and there are functions that may not.
>
> el
>
> On 2015-07-24 13:58, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> > On 24 Jul 2015, at 13:17, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> >
> >> If the Master Root (currently the A Root, me thinks) were to
> >> switch to ICANN it must also have an ironclad and veto proof
> >> budget for running expenses due to Safety and Stability reasons.
> >
> > Sorry for being a bit pedantic, but we must be correct on how the
> > root zone management system works.
> >
> > The RZM is managed by ICANN, Verisign and NTIA together.  Two
> > agreements cover it.  This will change as one of them is going
> > away.  Root server operators (including Verisign, running A-root)
> > is fetching the root zone from whatever service the RZM is
> > providing accordingly.
> >
> > Questions regarding potential implications on the RZM during the
> > transition, is covered by for example the SSAC documents published
> > lately.  Specifically SAC-067, SAC-068, SAC-069, SAC-071 and
> > SAC-072.
> >
> > What I think you say is that IF it is the case that the RZM
> > arrangement is changing so that the operational costs for PTI
> > increases there must be enough head room in the budget (and future
> > budgets) to accommodate for it.
> >
> > Patrik Fältström Head of Research and Development Netnod
> >
>
> - --
> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
> el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
> PO Box 8421             \     /
> Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIVAwUBVbI7tpcFHaN5RT+rAQIamg/+OggEuk2P3TgzAJP0MpArQHC8S/O5JIf5
> hIRBKfiYit/fFIlEKM0R1DcDZysjvC3TSNgOhaVisZeWWy1+5VYVkHK3jTrS0rwR
> p6m8Pp5iRnIPVNKaj4kRf3AqLWPyCveAtl+uHC+hm7Q1pOmK11xi2GBulyDJORl7
> wVJcf6QMpsBs7h4/F9GZ0pOZAd/Y4U7DA+jGKLL8nZPsLXX9i1dF/z6Mtf3+1yFC
> 6BgELcl6hJQRlcX5DgAC/U0SwdTqadLU9QtwzSd1C1Phhr0XgAE2s9M8tQFuZ5rI
> zpytyQxvdnvYA63S1GqQb79PDn/ezzCe/guJqbfK7bOFQZaUcOTx4gIS88tqsjiB
> zfF8ZbXii20ZwQlhLXpk2kwkVmflyQgFCzyIQ8gIfBNb8jPQ5T/3PQ9zqVjeLggL
> UAwVfkppN/Pk4blKsF0uC/keXCyPGtXgF9EHjDEkMlFp5epX0fr3BkTnMcpp8KSX
> 02fxBm4+2iJ8C9uiEWPinOUIh8AhV1LIO8bKEGV3rvGUGX+fApPJb+70AnnaVZOR
> NL8Y0lE8mxlLWwyOBW04SFlOXlhoiLwVkz/z04td2ZYalTEdx3lt2PD7BfcGU4n3
> ISsADC6+QWpi5VkCRHwVKsrl4qH/9jkzS1PvkrLL2fB0/SPj/ZDruC64v7OnABjI
> fnXM9HT1L8Q=
> =mmfi
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150724/c498c2c0/attachment.html>