[CCWG-ACCT] New section - ICANN Community Assembly

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Sun Jul 26 12:49:50 UTC 2015


Just curious, why do we need a separate group of people to form ICA? why
can't the current leadership of various SO/AC represent ICA?

I am a little concerned by these small silos and titles we may be creating
unintentionally. It is not also clear whether this ICA formation and its
activities would be triggered as a result of need to exercise 1 or more of
the community powers.

That said, since ICANN is going member route post-transition, I think an
assembly should indeed be open to all that are available, this mean it's
something that should normally hold during one of the 3 ICANN public
meetings just like it's the case with public forums.

On 25 Jul 2015 3:57 am, "Jordan Carter" <jordan at internetnz.net.nz> wrote:

> Hi all
> I have taken the draft material from an older paper about the ICANN
> Community Assembly and pulled it into one place.
> Please see attached and debate away!  I've tried to be clear on its solely
> advisory nature, and have suggested that this would be the forum to use for
> the Public Accountability Forum suggestion made by advisors a while ago.
> best,
> Jordan
> --
> Jordan Carter
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
> +64-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
> Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
> *A better world through a better Internet *
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150726/9fb188e1/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list