[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] Revised draft - Voting weights in community mechanism

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sun Jul 26 19:23:03 UTC 2015

Do we have formal confirmation from the RSSAC 
that they are happy with being excluded. The last 
I heard, Lyman said he was pretty sure that was 
their position, but that he could not formally speak on their behalf.

Simlarly, we should have formal confirmation from 
the other groups that they are prepared to 
participate. I can give that on behalf of the ALAC.


At 26/07/2015 01:24 AM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>Hi everyone
>Here is an update of the previously not-updated 
>text on voting weights. I am sorry that I 
>haven’t got tracked changes to show you - 
>it’s not much changed from what was circulated 
>a few days ago (the redline staff draft that hadn’t actually been finished).
>We still need to develop quorum and 
>participation rules - I believe Bernie is 
>working on a paper on this, for discussion next week.
>This is on the agenda for WP1 on 27 July.
>Jordan Carter
>Chief Executive
>04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
><mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>Skype: jordancarter
>To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150726/29ea58ea/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list