[CCWG-ACCT] Revised draft - Voting weights in community mechanism

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Sun Jul 26 19:57:42 UTC 2015


Hi,

This looks good. Just for clarity, it may be good to indicate the
connection between the ICA and community votes. i.e will the votes be
exercised by the ICA representatives? This may also determine the number of
ICA representatives per SO/AC

Regards
On 26 Jul 2015 6:30 am, "Jordan Carter" <jordan at internetnz.net.nz> wrote:

> Hi everyone
>
> Here is an update of the previously not-updated text on voting weights. I
> am sorry that I haven’t got tracked changes to show you - it’s not much
> changed from what was circulated a few days ago (the redline staff draft
> that hadn’t actually been finished).
>
> We still need to develop quorum and participation rules - I believe Bernie
> is working on a paper on this, for discussion next week.
>
> This is on the agenda for WP1 on 27 July.
>
> best
> Jordan
>
>
>
> --
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> *To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150726/a353e4a9/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list