[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] Revised draft - Voting weights in community mechanism
rickert at anwaelte.de
Sun Jul 26 20:01:43 UTC 2015
They confirmed to co-chairs when we met them in BA. Pls work on the assumption they will not vote. Do not exclude them from joining discussions, though.
Same for SSAC.
PS - Sent from my cell. Please excuse typos and brevity.
> Am 26.07.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>:
> Do we have formal confirmation from the RSSAC that they are happy with being excluded. The last I heard, Lyman said he was pretty sure that was their position, but that he could not formally speak on their behalf.
> Simlarly, we should have formal confirmation from the other groups that they are prepared to participate. I can give that on behalf of the ALAC.
> At 26/07/2015 01:24 AM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>> Hi everyone
>> Here is an update of the previously not-updated text on voting weights. I am sorry that I haven’t got tracked changes to show you - it’s not much changed from what was circulated a few days ago (the redline staff draft that hadn’t actually been finished).
>> We still need to develop quorum and participation rules - I believe Bernie is working on a paper on this, for discussion next week.
>> This is on the agenda for WP1 on 27 July.
>> Jordan Carter
>> Chief Executive
>> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
>> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> Skype: jordancarter
>> To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community