[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] Revised draft - Voting weights in community mechanism

[Thomas Rickert]

They confirmed to co-chairs when we met them in BA.  Pls work on the assumption they will not vote. Do not exclude them from joining discussions, though.

Same for SSAC.

Thomas 


========
rickert.net

PS - Sent from my cell. Please excuse typos and brevity.

> Am 26.07.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>:
> 
> Do we have formal confirmation from the RSSAC that they are happy with being excluded. The last I heard, Lyman said he was pretty sure that was their position, but that he could not formally speak on their behalf.
> 
> Simlarly, we should have formal confirmation from the other groups that they are prepared to participate. I can give that on behalf of the ALAC.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 26/07/2015 01:24 AM, Jordan Carter wrote:
>> Hi everyone 
>> 
>> Here is an update of the previously not-updated text on voting weights. I am sorry that I haven’t got tracked changes to show you - it’s not much changed from what was circulated a few days ago (the redline staff draft that hadn’t actually been finished).
>> 
>> We still need to develop quorum and participation rules - I believe Bernie is working on a paper on this, for discussion next week.
>> 
>> This is on the agenda for WP1 on 27 July.
>> 
>> best
>> Jordan
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jordan Carter
>> 
>> Chief Executive 
>> InternetNZ
>> 
>> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
>> jordan at internetnz.net.nz 
>> Skype: jordancarter
>> 
>> To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150726/1b0e8d88/attachment.html>