[CCWG-ACCT] yet another human rights question
nigel at channelisles.net
Tue Jul 28 09:08:09 UTC 2015
The point I was making, perhaps far too subtly, is that we don't need to
spend much time on the academic niceties I set out in 1-6. It would,
perhaps, be worth knowing (and certainly interesting to know) if there
ARE currently any obligations on ICANN due to the contract, but if there
are, I can't see them.
And ICANN do not appear ever to have paid any mind at all, in the past.
But, exactly as you said, 7 is sufficient.
On 07/28/2015 09:00 AM, avri doria wrote:
> While I have doubt that your propositions 1-6 hold in law (none of us is an international lawyer), 7 is sufficient for a WS1 effect.
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community