[CCWG-ACCT] yet another human rights question

Nigel Roberts nigel at channelisles.net
Tue Jul 28 09:08:09 UTC 2015

The point I was making, perhaps far too subtly, is that we don't need to 
spend much time on the academic niceties I set out in 1-6. It would, 
perhaps, be worth knowing (and certainly interesting to know) if there 
ARE currently any obligations on ICANN due to the contract, but if there 
are, I can't see them.

And ICANN do not appear ever to have paid any mind at all, in the past.

But, exactly as you said, 7 is sufficient.

On 07/28/2015 09:00 AM, avri doria wrote:
> Hi,
> While I have doubt that your propositions 1-6 hold in law (none of us is an international lawyer), 7 is sufficient for a WS1 effect.

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list