[CCWG-ACCT] Draft Agenda & Papers - WP1 Meeting #22 (28 July at 19h UTC)
ceo at auda.org.au
Tue Jul 28 13:19:14 UTC 2015
Agreed el. But there is a difference between the ccNSO members authorising the ccNSO to engage in the governance of soccer and FIFA accepting the input of the ccNSO regarding the governance of soccer :-)
> On 28 Jul 2015, at 23:14 , Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
> Quite of of context from the bylaws:
> "However, the ccNSO may also engage in other activities authorized by
> its members."
> On 2015-07-28 13:45, Chris Disspain wrote:
>> Hi Avri,
>>> SOs are only
>>> empowered to make recommendations on the subject matter of the SO, i.e.
>>> only on gTLDs, ccTLDs or Numbers.
>>> We assrt our right to comment on
>>> other stuff, but there is no bylaws indication of this empowerment.
>> Who is we?
>>> It is only the ACs that are empowered to advise on any issue having to
>>> do with ICANN.
>> Agreed. So that means that the non-contracting party bits of GNSO are
>> only empowered to comment on gTLD matters, doesn’t it?
>> Assuming that is correct then it seems to me that in respect to 'ICANN’s
>> general well being’ we should not draw a distinction between ACs and
>> SOs. SOs and ACs are empowered to comment on 'ICANN’s general well
>> being’ with authority/weight and bits of the SOs and ACs are entitled to
>> comment (as is anyone as an individual) but not with the same authority
>> and weight as comments on SOs and ACs as a whole.
>> Does that make sense?
> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
> el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
> PO Box 8421 \ /
> Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community