[CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] Revised draft - Voting weights in community mechanism

Mathieu Weill mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Wed Jul 29 13:52:25 UTC 2015

Thank you Chris, that's very useful and I can understand.

However that veto on the "extremely narrow band of global policies for 
ccTLDs"  would only be possible if the policy also implied a Bylaw 
change. Did that ever happen or is that even conceivable ? IDN ccTLD 
Fast track or Framework of Interpretation did not I believe.

You have more experience than me on that.


Le 29/07/2015 14:38, Chris Disspain a écrit :
> Well, here I am prepared to express an opinion. The ccNSO policy 
> by-law is clearly written and sets out the basis upon which ccNSO 
> policy can be dealt with by the Board. There is a requirement for 
> the ccNSO to involve the other relevant ICANN bodies in its policy 
> making. The idea that the extremely narrow band of global policies for 
> ccTLDs that may be undertaken by the ccNSO in accordance with the 
> carefully crafted and politically balanced methodologies that have 
> been created could, in essence, be blocked by other SOs and ACs is 
> totally unacceptable to auDA and I suspect would be unacceptable to a 
> number of my ccTLD colleagues.

Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150729/32c8e0da/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list