[CCWG-ACCT] Call(s) on Thursday
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Wed Jul 29 15:34:13 UTC 2015
Nigel, Why is being a "participant" relevant? As
a member, I find it extremely hard to make some
calls and in fact, missed one yesterday because
it exactly overlapped with a meeting I was
chairing. Sometimes attendance is easy, sometimes
it required moving mountains, and sometimes I
simply opt out for various reasons.
At 29/07/2015 04:27 AM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>As a mere participant I have found it almost
>impossible to join the calls due to the vast
>number of them and the release of important
>documents no more than hours before.
>If I was cynical, I would suggest this method of
>working was deliberately exclusionary.
>As several other participants know from their
>membership of another extremely important and
>potentially controversial WG, there is another, better, way.
>But that would incompatible with the self-created urgency.
>I am beginning to become seriously worried that
>major changes will be made to the ICANN
>structure and IANA relationship without the time
>for due consideration, just because there's a US
>Presidential election in the office.
>On 07/29/2015 09:05 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>>I have a previous engagement at 17:00 UTC.
>>And as previously I object against having 2 or more calls on the same day.
>>On 2015-07-29 08:23, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>>>The poll is now closed. Staff will proceed to schedule _two calls
>>>for Thursday 30 July_:
>>> * 11:00 13:00 UTC
>>> * 17:00 19:00 UTC (this call may need to be extended depending on
>>> progress made)
>>>Please look forward to calendar notices. The Agenda will follow later
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community