[CCWG-ACCT] Call(s) on Thursday

[Alan Greenberg]

Nigel, Why is being a "participant" relevant? As 
a member, I find it extremely hard to make some 
calls and in fact, missed one yesterday because 
it exactly overlapped with a meeting I was 
chairing. Sometimes attendance is easy, sometimes 
it required moving mountains, and sometimes I 
simply opt out for various reasons.

Alan

At 29/07/2015 04:27 AM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>As a mere participant I have found it almost 
>impossible to join the calls due to the vast 
>number of them and the release of important 
>documents no more than hours before.
>
>If I was cynical, I would suggest this method of 
>working was deliberately exclusionary.
>
>As several other participants know from their 
>membership of another extremely important and 
>potentially controversial WG, there is another, better, way.
>
>But that would incompatible with the self-created urgency.
>
>I am beginning to become seriously worried that 
>major changes will be made to the ICANN 
>structure and IANA relationship without the time 
>for due consideration, just because there's a US 
>Presidential election in the office.
>
>
>
>On 07/29/2015 09:05 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>>I have a previous engagement at 17:00 UTC.
>>
>>And as previously I object against having 2 or more calls on the same day.
>>
>>greetings, el
>>
>>On 2015-07-29 08:23, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>>>Dear all,
>>>
>>>The poll is now closed. Staff will proceed to schedule _two calls
>>>for Thursday 30 July_:
>>>
>>>    * 11:00 ­ 13:00 UTC
>>>    * 17:00 ­ 19:00 UTC (this call may need to be extended depending on
>>>      progress made)
>>>
>>>Please look forward to calendar notices. The Agenda will follow later
>>>today.
>>>
>>>Best,
>>>Grace
>>[...]
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community