[CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Minority Reports

Dr Eberhard Lisse el at lisse.NA
Thu Jul 30 11:34:07 UTC 2015


Thank you,

Thunderbird is getting the better of me :-)-O

Now we are saying we only do what we are not afraid of rather than what
is right?


el

On 2015-07-30 11:38, Jordan Carter wrote:
> Hi Eberhard,
> 
> It appears you are posting to a list that isn't the CCWG list - I'm
> posting to the same, I don't know who is on it.
> 
> You do seem to have a radically different idea as to what the purpose of
> the group was. If we had started intervening in the things that Keith
> listed as us not doing, all hell would surely have broken loose?
> 
> best
> Jordan
> 
> 
> On 30 July 2015 at 20:03, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el at lisse.na
> <mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:
> 
>     Dear Co-Chairs,
> 
>     I am going to quote the first paragraph in my minority viewpoint because
>     it explains the failure of the CCWG Accountability in two sentences.
> 
>     The second paragraph, which I have separated from the first for ease of
>     reference is painfully absurd.
> 
>     greetings, el
> 
>     On 2015-07-30 07:09, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>     [...]
>     > I think it's also important to note the proposal currently under
>     > discussion changes nothing about ICANN's day-to-day,
>     > month-to-month, or even year-to-year operations and community
>     > engagement structures.  Only in very rare cases would the proposed
>     > Sole Member community empowerment model come into play.
> 
> 
>     > In my opinion, its existence would be a powerful deterrent to bad
>     > behavior and would therefore become an available but largely
>     > unneeded tool.
>     [...]
> 
>     --
[...]



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list