[CCWG-ACCT] way forward and minority statements

[Greg Shatan]

I disagree with the opinion (made as a statement of fact, but really an
opinion) that "many" of the P/P proposals and issues "will price an
otherwise unregulated service out of the marketplace."  This strikes me
more as a scare tactic than any kind of rational concern.

And once again, misinformation on the minority position in the PPSAI, also
intended to make it scarier.  First, there is no "minority report," it was
a minority position in the WG.  Second, the actual language under
consideration is "domains used for online financial transactions for
commercial purpose."  So, it's not any financial transaction -- only those
transactions with a commercial purpose. And it's based on actual use of the
domain, so the reference to "will not" is also inaccurate. Far less
"impressive"....


On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

>  Just to get this on the record:  there is no formal proposal, correct.
> However, there are many proposals and issues that are as yet unresolved
> which will price an otherwise unregulated service out of the marketplace.
> There is indeed a minority report that recommends restricting P/P services
> to those who do not/will not use a domain for financial transactions.  That
> is an impressive restriction on the ability to use privacy proxy services.
> Cheers SP
>
> On 2015-07-30 11:47, Greg Shatan wrote:
>
>  Nobody has to publish their confidential information to the world in
> order to register a domain name.  Privacy/proxy services are readily
> available and there is no formal proposal to take that away from anyone.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150730/24ff9b2c/attachment.html>