[CCWG-ACCT] What are the WS2 activities that ensue from a WS1 bylaws commitment to human rights?
malcolm at linx.net
Fri Jul 31 09:05:35 UTC 2015
On 31/07/2015 09:11, Avri Doria wrote:
> In order to outline some of the work that would need to be done in WS2,
> given a WS1 bylaws commitment to human rights, e.g. Drazek as ammended
> by Lisse
> /Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will be committed to respect the fundamental human rights, inter alia, the exercise of free expression and the free flow of information./
> I have extracted the following text from
> * Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
That doesn't look like a multistakeholder document to me. It seems to
have set out responsibilities for businesses without involving
businesses in its formulation. So, valuable input as a reference point,
but is it something we would simply accept as an unimpeachable statement
applicable to this community?
> 13. The responsibility to respect human rights requires that business
> (b) Seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts that
> are directly linked to their operations, products or services by
> their business relationships, even if they have not contributed to
> those impacts.
As this applies to ICANN, do you think this creates a duty to use its
business relationships with Registries and Registrars seek to prevent
human rights abuses by domain registrants?
I think it could be argued that that is what the quoted text means, and
I would disagree strongly with accepting it without qualification for
Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd
21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
Company Registered in England No. 3137929
Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community