[CCWG-ACCT] Accountability in regard with IETF and RIRes Accountability

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Co-Chairs
Our chater relating to work Stream 1 indicates / referred to the
 accountability  which must be in place or committed before transition
takes place.
In CCWG ,to gether with / inconsultation with CWG we have addressed
accountability regarding Naming Community.
However, regardinfg Parameters / Protocol and Numbers accountability
nothing is mentioned.
Accoring to IETF and CRISP they do not need any accountability ? WHICHIDOUBT
I draw your attention to the PART OF THE  latest views of IETF regarding
transition :
Quote








*" The IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) has decided to use an
update of our yearly IETF-ICANN Service Level Agreement (SLA) as the
mechanism for this updated agreement. They have drafted the update and from
our perspective it could be immediately executed. Once the updated
agreement is in place, the transition would be substantially complete, with
only the NTIA contract lapse or termination as a final step*."
Unqiote
It seems to me neither IETF not RIREs wish to have any commuinity
empowerment in their activities .Please look at their proposals to ICG
dated 06 and 15 January 2015
On the other hand   Parameters / Protocol and Numbers like Naming require
accountability from those implementing them
My question to Lega Adviser is ,reading the proposals from IETF and RIREs
to ICG, do they need to be accountable to the community or nor.We need to
have a clwear advice on this
Regards
KAVOUSS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150608/9abacc7e/attachment.html>