[CCWG-ACCT] The Strickling Vindication

[Adebunmi AKINBO]

Apologies but +1 Lisse
-AA.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:

> Dear Co-Chairs,
>
> to put it into my usually charming bedside manner, now that Mr Strickling
> has handed us vital parts of our anatomy, are you now going to start
> listening?
>
> I already said and wrote since Singapore that we are going about this the
> wrong way, and we should toss all this out and start from fresh. I still
> believe that to be true.
>
> Never mind the process, which has been invalidated close to capture.
>
> As you are aware I will not be able to make it to the meeting today, which
> I am on record objecting to, unless SA222 has WiFi so I would want to delay
> the discussion of the impact to one of the F2Fs in BA.
>
> However, I for the world of me can not understand why someone would
> suggest to bring in an uncharted third party in to comment on our eventual
> proposal.
>
> Other than admitting to Mr Strickling that this CCWG does not have the
> required understanding.
>
> I agree that there are mainly functionaries on this CCWG, and of course
> the lobbyists of the gBusinesses have no interest to look at this so even
> asking the gRegistries to have their technical/operational staff support
> their charted members is going to be a waste of time.
>
> But, as I have written and said before, it's the ccTLDs that matter. Not
> only for me but also because there is nothing in the CWG/CCWG for these.
>
> And that (for the wannabes around here: the removal of the one, albeit
> theoretical, safeguard against arbitrary actions agains ccTLD Managers) as
> much as not knowing the answers to fundamental questions, WILL have an
> impact on Security and Stability of the DNS. Probably more affecting the
> Local rather than Global Internet.
>
> So I STRONGLY urge that the ccTLD Managers represented as charted members
> and participants, if any, sit down with or without the gRegistries and look
> at this.
>
>
> And why on Earth the SSAC? What does it have to do with anything? In
> particular ccTLDs? and their last paper showed a blessed ignorance about
> what's happening inside ccTLDs.
>
> greetings, el
> --
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150619/75b994f8/attachment.html>