[CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

ROTLPIMPHMSBAH

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On Jun 19, 2015, at 17:35, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org> wrote:
> 
> Yes it does. I apologize. I was challenging the efficacy of a proposed accountability mechanism and was asked to support my argument. I probably should have ignored what was likely a rhetorical request but I didn't.
> 
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse
> Sent: ‎6/‎19/‎2015 5:28 PM
> To: CCWG Accountability
> Cc: Lisse Eberhard
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model
> 
> Dear Ch-Chairs,
> 
> not that I disagree, but does this not conflict with the "modest proposal" ventilated by same on 2015-04-31?
> 
> greetings, el
> 
> -- 
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5s
> 
> 
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 15:48, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org> wrote:
> 
>> Sigh. Okay.
>> Failed thus far to develop binding accountability mechanisms.
>> Failed to adhere to policies around publication of documents prior to meetings.
>> Failed to prevent decision making prior to termination of comment periods.
>> Developed no standard for review during the previous attempt at accountability reform (2006?)
>> Failed to develop public metrics to hold ICANN institutions to account (such as contract compliance)
>> Failed to listen to community consensus on singular/plural and controlled the outcome of the redress mechanisms through overly narrow mandate.
>> Pushed ahead with new gTLD program despite a lack of operational readiness, again without consequences.
>> Launched a staff lead review of the new gTLD program prior to any input from the community.
>> Scheduled new round of applications (at least initially) prior to scheduled reviews.
>> Failed to reign in the Net Mundial initiative despite community objection or specify any consequences for secret board resolutions, etc.
>> Accepted the GC advice to protect the corporation instead of the public interest. 
>> Weakened rather than strengthened the IRP. 
>> Allowed staff to unilaterally change community agreement on registry agreements and imposed the unilateral right to amend registry agreements. 
>> Failed to implement half of the ATRT1 recommendations, again without consequences.
>> Supported the practice of passing off all responsibility to third parties so ICANN has no risk. (.SUCKS is the latest example)
>> First attempted to prevent an accountability component to the IANA transition and then tried to control it, insert experts, etc. rather than trusting the community to organize itself.
>> 
>> Just a few thoughts off the top of my head. Your turn.
>> 
>> 
>> Jonathan Zuck
>> President
>> ACT: The App Association
>> Www.ACTonline.org
>> 
[...]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150619/4367e000/attachment.html>