[CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model

[Drazek, Keith]

Dear Co-Chairs,

Please inform our colleague that he appears to have sat on his device.

Regards,
Keith


On Jun 19, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na<mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:

ROTLPIMPHMSBAH

el

--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

On Jun 19, 2015, at 17:35, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org<mailto:JZuck at actonline.org>> wrote:

Yes it does. I apologize. I was challenging the efficacy of a proposed accountability mechanism and was asked to support my argument. I probably should have ignored what was likely a rhetorical request but I didn't.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse<mailto:epilisse at gmail.com>
Sent: ‎6/‎19/‎2015 5:28 PM
To: CCWG Accountability<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Cc: Lisse Eberhard<mailto:directors at omadhina.NET>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised Powers Chart, Voluntary Model

Dear Ch-Chairs,

not that I disagree, but does this not conflict with the "modest proposal" ventilated by same on 2015-04-31?

greetings, el

--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5s


On Jun 19, 2015, at 15:48, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at actonline.org<mailto:JZuck at actonline.org>> wrote:

Sigh. Okay.

  1.
Failed thus far to develop binding accountability mechanisms.
  2.
Failed to adhere to policies around publication of documents prior to meetings.
  3.
Failed to prevent decision making prior to termination of comment periods.
  4.
Developed no standard for review during the previous attempt at accountability reform (2006?)
  5.
Failed to develop public metrics to hold ICANN institutions to account (such as contract compliance)
  6.
Failed to listen to community consensus on singular/plural and controlled the outcome of the redress mechanisms through overly narrow mandate.
  7.
Pushed ahead with new gTLD program despite a lack of operational readiness, again without consequences.
  8.
Launched a staff lead review of the new gTLD program prior to any input from the community.
  9.
Scheduled new round of applications (at least initially) prior to scheduled reviews.
  10.
Failed to reign in the Net Mundial initiative despite community objection or specify any consequences for secret board resolutions, etc.
  11.
Accepted the GC advice to protect the corporation instead of the public interest.
  12.
Weakened rather than strengthened the IRP.
  13.
Allowed staff to unilaterally change community agreement on registry agreements and imposed the unilateral right to amend registry agreements.
  14.
Failed to implement half of the ATRT1 recommendations, again without consequences.
  15.
Supported the practice of passing off all responsibility to third parties so ICANN has no risk. (.SUCKS is the latest example)
  16.
First attempted to prevent an accountability component to the IANA transition and then tried to control it, insert experts, etc. rather than trusting the community to organize itself.

Just a few thoughts off the top of my head. Your turn.


Jonathan Zuck
President
ACT: The App Association
http://Www.ACTonline.org


[...]
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150619/cf15a7be/attachment.html>