[CCWG-ACCT] Notes-Recordings-Transcript links for CCWG ACCT Session #14 24 February

[Jordan Carter]

This discussion is very helpful for the design work in wp1 on this precise
power, so thank you for all the contributions.

Bruce: who defines the global public interest? And who judges it in the
context of removing one, more or all Icann directors from their roles?

Interested in your view on this point.

Best
Jordan

On Monday, 2 March 2015, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
wrote:

> Hello All,
>
>
> >>  "possible but very difficult to do."
>
> Agreed.   I think the main difference between my view and Alan's view is
> that I think there should be some objective standards - one of which is
> that the Board member is not acting in the global public interest.   It is
> still up to the segment of the appointing community that appoints the
> director to make that call and justify their decision to the wider
> community.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <javascript:;>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>


-- 
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive, InternetNZ

+64-21-442-649 | jordan at internetnz.net.nz

Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150302/e53b8802/attachment.html>