[CCWG-ACCT] Reconsideration Sub-Group of the CCWG Work Party 2 Review and Redress

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Does there need to be reconsideration based on a claim that staff action
contravenes  PDP developed policy?

Or was that contained in one of the included issues already?

avri


On 08-Mar-15 18:19, Robin Gross wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This email is to kick-off the discussion for the Reconsideration
> Sub-Group of the CCWG Work Party 2 Review and Redress Mechanisms.
>
> Volunteers so far: Robin Gross, Ed Morris, Chris LaHatte, David
> McAuley, Carlos Gutierrez (please send a note to
> <alice.jansen at icann.org <mailto:alice.jansen at icann.org>> to volunteer
> for this sub-group).
>
> This WP2 sub-group should will look specifically at issues to be
> addressed with respect to improving ICANN's accountability mechanisms
> involving a reconsideration process of a board or management decision.
>
> Specific Task:  To review the current rules under which
> reconsideration occurs, and to propose appropriate changes to those
> rules to create adequate accountability. 
>
> Existing "Reconsideration Request" accountability mechanism:
>
> See ICANN Bylaws Art. IV, Sec. 2) Board reconsideration of:
>
> - One or more staff actions or inactions that contradict established
> ICANN policy(ies); or
>
> -  One or more actions or inactions of the ICANN Board that have been
> taken or refused to be taken without consideration of material
> information, except where the party submitting the request could have
> submitted, but did not submit, the information for the Board's
> consideration at the time of action or refusal to act; or
>
>     - One or more actions or inactions of the ICANN Board that are
> taken as a result of the Board's reliance on false or inaccurate
> material information. 
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Suggestions for Change/Enhancement ICANN's Reconsideration Processes:*
>
> 1.     Mechanism for review of Board or management action in conflict
> with ICANN Bylaws or Articles of Incorporation.
>
> 2.     Mechanism to require community (members, AC/SOs, etc.) to
> require Board to act on, implement, amend, accelerate implementation
> of, a previously approved ATRT recommendation.
>
> 3.     Change bylaws for Reconsideration Process: trigger when board
> acts arbitrarily or capriciously; decisions subject to Independent Review.
>
> 4.     Reconsideration of staff action/inaction.
>
> 5.     Broadly expand grounds on which ICANN decisions and operations
> can be challenged; lower threshold to succeed in a challenge.
>
> 6.  Reasonable time deadlines and other due process considerations.
>
> What else?
>
> ------------------
>
> *Proposal to address implementation and operational issues including:*
>
> ·      Standing
>
> ·      Standard of review
>
> ·      Composition
>
> ·      Selection
>
> ·      Decision-making
>
> ·      Accessibility
>
>  *  Implementation
>
>  *  Due process
>
> Work Party 2 Reconsideration mailing
> list – wp2-reconsideration at icann.org
> <mailto:wp2-reconsideration at icann.org> – is now active.
> Public archives may be found
> at: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2-reconsideration/
>
> May this sub-group please have a wiki page?  Thank you.
>
> Please volunteer for this sub-group - especially if you have any
> experience with ICANN's reconsideration process.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150308/ad3e6ff6/attachment.html>