[CCWG-ACCT] Of possible interest re Accountability and the need for Independent Review

[David Post]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/03/09/icann-copyright-infringement-and-the-public-interest/

David

>On 8 March 2015 at 12:03, Robin Gross 
><<mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:
>We need to add an evaluation of the "Cooperative 
>Engagement Process" or "CEP" - the initial or 
>pre step to trigger an IRP on an ICANN 
>decision.  There are timing, transparency, and 
>due process issues to consider in the CEP step an ICANN IRP.
>Thanks,
>Robin
>
>On Mar 6, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Alice Munyua wrote:
>
>>Dear David
>>Thank you.
>>Re-sending and  would like to add another 
>>issue regarding timely communication to all affected parties.
>>Best regards
>>Alice
>>
>>>Alice
>>>Thanks - it doesn't look like your message got 
>>>distributed to the group list which I think would be a good idea -
>>>David
>>>At 01:48 AM 3/6/2015, you wrote:
>>>>Dear David,
>>>>Thank you for this list of topics.
>>>>11. Should the IRP be provided with clear time lines for each stage
>>>>12 What provisions can be put in place for 
>>>>redress against the IRP provider in the event the process goes off track
>>>>
>>>>Best regards
>>>>Alice Munyua
>>>>AUC
>>>>
>>>>On 06/03/2015 01:19, David Post wrote:
>>>>>[This is for the Independent Review 
>>>>>subgroup:Â  Paul Rosenzweig, David McAuley, 
>>>>>Jonathan Zuck, Robin Gross, Chris LaHatte, 
>>>>>me]. I don't think a separate mailing list 
>>>>>has been set up, so I apologize to the rest 
>>>>>of you who are working on other issues here]
>>>>>I'm a little bit late to the WP2 party, but 
>>>>>I thought, just for the purpose of kicking 
>>>>>off our discussion, we might see if there we 
>>>>>can generate a list of topics that we need 
>>>>>to cover for the design of the IRP --
>>>>>I'm sure there are others, but here's a 
>>>>>starter group, picking up on some of the 
>>>>>"issues" listed in the latest work item list and adding a few others:
>>>>>1.  Will the IRP be a permanent standing 
>>>>>panel, or will it have rotating membership?
>>>>>2.  What is the scope of the IRB's 
>>>>>jurisdiction - what kinds of claims can it hear?Â
>>>>>3.  What standard of review will it use to render its decisions?
>>>>>4.  Standing - who can bring claims to the IRP?
>>>>>5.  How will IRB members be nominated and appointed?
>>>>>6.  Term - for how long will IRP members 
>>>>>serve?  Can they be re-appointed?
>>>>>7.  Will there be a process for removal of IRP members?
>>>>>8.  Costs - who will pay IRP costs?
>>>>>9.  How will IRP decisions be 
>>>>>implemented?  Are they binding on the 
>>>>>Board?  Can they be overturned by the Board?
>>>>>10.  Should changes to the IRP process be 
>>>>>made permanent (i.e., not subject to Board 
>>>>>modification)? If so, how can we accomplish that?
>>>>>
>>>>>As I said, I'm sure there are things missing 
>>>>>or mis-stated - but I do think it would be 
>>>>>worth trying to put a list like this 
>>>>>together to structure our discussion as we plunge forward.
>>>>>David
>>>>>
>>>>>*******************************
>>>>>David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open 
>>>>>Technology Institute/New America Foundation
>>>>>blog (Volokh Conspiracy) 
>>>>><http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post>http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post 
>>>>>
>>>>>book (Jefferson's 
>>>>>Moose)Â 
>>>>><http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0>http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n   Â
>>>>>music 
>>>>><http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic>http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic 
>>>>>publications 
>>>>>etc. 
>>>>><http://www.davidpost.com%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0/>http://www.davidpost.com 
>>>>>Â Â Â Â Â
>>>>>*******************************
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>WP2 mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>><mailto:WP2 at icann.org>WP2 at icann.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>WP2 mailing list
>>>><mailto:WP2 at icann.org>WP2 at icann.org
>>>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
>>>*******************************
>>>David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology 
>>>Institute/New America Foundation
>>>blog (Volokh Conspiracy) 
>>><http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post>http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post 
>>>
>>>book (Jefferson's 
>>>Moose)Â 
>>><http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0>http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n 
>>>Â Â Â Â Â
>>>music 
>>><http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic%A0>http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic 
>>>publications 
>>>etc. 
>>><http://www.davidpost.com%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0/>http://www.davidpost.com 
>>>Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
>>>*******************************
>>_______________________________________________
>>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>><mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org 
>>
>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
><mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org 
>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose)  http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n
music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic 
publications etc.  http://www.davidpost.com
*******************************  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150309/56e855c7/attachment.html>