[CCWG-ACCT] Work Stream 1 and Work Stream 2: Comments based on impressions from Meeting Notes.

[Jordan Carter]

Hi Sivasubramanian,

This comes as something out of the blue in the sense that the CCWG has been
actively discussing a wide range of Work Stream 1 proposals that have been
clearly signalled in writing for weeks and weeks now.

Do you have some concrete proposals about the sorts of items before this
CCWG and its Working Parties that you believe *should* be part of Work
Stream 1 (pre-transition)?

That would be very helpful input, as soon as possible.

I think the CCWG at its meeting in Istanbul will need to resolve its pitch
to the community as to what should be in WS1 and WS2....


thanks,
Jordan


On 12 March 2015 at 13:54, Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello
>
>
> I was not present for the Legal Sub Team call
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52891852 on 10th
> March and have not listened to the recording either. This comment is based
> on the Introductory section of the Meeting Notes, which might not be points
> discussed at length during the Sub Team meeting, quoted below, and raised
> here as a point to consider by the whole group:
>
> Notes:  2. Brief Discussion:
>>
>>    - WS2 - no need to be in place before transition takes place but
>>    needs to take place post transition.
>>
>>
>> Three items need to be put in place as part of WS1.
>>
>>    - Recalling members of the ICANN board of directors.
>>
>>
>>    - Community empowerment over ICANN's management.
>>
>>
>>    - Limiting the scope of ICANN's activity.
>>
>>
>    -
>
>
> One of the several proposals for Work Stream 2 was based on the rationale
> that pre-transition changes to the Accountability framework is minimal with
> major improvements to discussed and carried out on an ongoing basis post
> transition.
>
> With almost zero discussion on Work Stream 2, without even the formation
> of work stream 2, it is highly undesirable to think of such changes to the
> Accountability framework as the inclusion of provisions to recall members
> of the Board, limiting the scope of ICANN's activity or even Community
> empowerment over ICANN management.
>
> Within a well-considered and larger Accountability environment such
> changes could be effected in phases, in tune with a larger and clearer blue
> print, but without even a beginning on such a blue print, it is unwise to
> think of the changes as proposed for WS1. These provisions, if included
> pre-transition and in a rush, could prove counter productive.
>
> I would propose the bare minimal improvements to the Accountability
> framework, if such improvements are to be made in a rush. At best, WS 1
> could discuss such changes but leave it for implementation post transition,
> after more elaborate thinking.
>
> Sivasubramanian M
>
>
>
> Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>


-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150312/25beebf2/attachment.html>