[CCWG-ACCT] Impact of accountability measures

[James M. Bladel]

Jorge:

Apologies for the delayed response, but I agree that this should be a
concern/consideration.  In addition to ³balance² we should also consider
the impact of new accountability mechanisms on the ³stability² of ICANN,
the institution.  Commercial (and non-commercial) organizations align
their strategic plans to ICANN decisions & actions, and if these are
vacillating or tied up in endless appeals procedures, it could introduce
uncertainty into the DNS industry.

Thanks‹

J.




On 3/3/15, 7:11 , "Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch"
<Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:

>Dear all
>
>I would just like to share a general thought with you: I wonder whether
>the different accountability mechanism descriptions/proposals will be
>presented with an assessment of their impact on the "power structures"
>within ICANN and on the appropriate balance between parts of the
>community, most conductive to serve the global public interest.
>
>Perhaps I'm missing this part as I've joined this process rather
>recently, but I'm not seeing this aspect covered in the templates and
>proposals of accountability measures
>
>Best
>
>
>Jorge Cancio 
>
>International Relations
>Federal Department of the Environment,
>Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC
>Federal Office of Communications OFCOM
>Zukunftstrasse 44, CH 2501 Biel
>Tel. +41 58 460 54 58 (direct)
>Tel. +41 32 327 55 11 (office)
>Fax +41 58 460 54 66
>mailto: jorge.cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>www.bakom.admin.ch
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community