[CCWG-ACCT] Regarding ICANN's adherence to "international law"

[Bruce Tonkin]

Hello David,

Agreed.   Becky Burr and others have also raised this – it is one of the items for improvement.

This change to this language was made after a recommendation from the Accountability Structures Experts Panel – but it clearly has unintended consequences.

See page 48 of:  https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-26oct12-en.pdf

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin


From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of David Post
Sent: Monday, 16 March 2015 12:26 AM
To: Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Regarding ICANN's adherence to "international law"

At 08:16 PM 3/14/2015, Bruce Tonkin wrote:

Under its Articles of Incorporation ICANN already operates “for the benefit of the Internet community as a whole, carrying out its activities in conformity with relevant principles of international law and applicable international conventions and local law.”   See: https://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/articles

The Independent Review Process allows parties to challenge Board decisions that are inconsistent with the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws.

[SNIP]

Just by way of clarification, while it's true that the IRP allows parties "to challenge Board decisions that are inconsistent with the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws," the IRP panel does not have the power to actually decide the question of whether or not a Board decision WAS inconsistent with the Articles or Bylaws.  See Bylaws, Art IV sec 3(4):

"The IRP Panel must apply a defined standard of review to the IRP request, focusing on:

     *   did the Board act without conflict of interest in taking its decision?;
     *   did the Board exercise due diligence and care in having a reasonable amount of facts in front of them?; and
     *   did the Board members exercise independent judgment in taking the decision, believed to be in the best interests of the company?"
That's a much narrower scope of inquiry than whether the Board acted outside the ByLaws, for example.

David

*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
book (Jefferson's Moose)  http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n      <http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0>
music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc.  http://www.davidpost.com        <http://www.davidpost.com        />
*******************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150315/66363508/attachment.html>