[CCWG-ACCT] decision making by the community - tool to play with

[Thomas Rickert]

All,
the composition of the community council (or whatever we might ultimately call it) is still unclear. Open issues - amongst others - are:

- voting vs consensus calls
- mandated voting vs non-mandated voting
- number of representatives from SOs/ACs
- voting thresholds
- weighting of votes
…

As indicated during the call yesterday, we have been working with Berry on a spreadsheet, which you find attached to this e-mail and which allows you to test different scenarios. You can enter the number of representatives per group and their voting behavior and then see how that impacts the outcome of decisions for different voting thresholds.

We do know that this is not the silver bullet solution, but it helps to better understand the impact of different approaches.

We hope you find this helpful and encourage you to come up with concrete suggestions for the composition of the "community council“.

Kind regards,
Thomas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CCWG_Threshold_Tool_v0.2.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 11452 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150318/1ce0d49a/CCWG_Threshold_Tool_v0.2.xlsx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150318/1ce0d49a/signature.asc>