[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Advisors joining Istanbul meeting
Robin Gross
robin at ipjustice.org
Thu Mar 19 14:44:37 UTC 2015
Much appreciated, Adam!
Best,
Robin
On Mar 19, 2015, at 6:18 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Replies received from the Advisors, they understand the communities's concerns and are happy for their meeting on Sunday 22 March to be open to observers.
>
> Staff will provide room details, etc, in due course.
>
> Thanks for you patience.
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> From: Adam Peake <adam.peake at icann.org>
> Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 8:27 PM
> To: Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
> Cc: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Advisors joining Istanbul meeting
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I understand your concerns. We are working on a solution and will let you know shortly.
>
> Thank you for your understanding.
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> From: Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
> Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 7:25 PM
> To: Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com>
> Cc: Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>, Adam Peake <adam.peake at icann.org>, Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Advisors joining Istanbul meeting
>
> All: I see the utility of the advisors having a meeting on their own, but agree with the perception issue created if staff are briefing them or providing background absent CCWG members.
>
> Can I suggest that the best way to do this would be for one of the co-chairs to be in the room with the advisors when staff are there, for the relevant section of the meeting?
>
> I don't have any view at this stage about the need for that part of the meeting to be open to observers etc - it doesn't sound like a bad idea or a problem to me per se to have that bit open. Open tho doesn't to me imply remote participation etc at this point.
>
> Cheers
> Jordan
>
> On 19 March 2015 at 10:43, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
>> Correction: Ed, Robin & Keith
>>
>> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
>> Virtualaw LLC
>> 1155 F Street, NW
>> Suite 1050
>> Washington, DC 20004
>> 202-559-8597/Direct
>> 202-559-8750/Fax
>> 202-255-6172/cell
>>
>> Twitter: @VlawDC
>>
>> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>>
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Phil Corwin
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:41 PM
>> To: Edward Morris; Adam Peake
>>
>> Cc: Accountability Cross Community
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Advisors joining Istanbul meeting
>>
>>
>> I concur with the views below from Adam, Robin & Keith.
>>
>> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
>> Virtualaw LLC
>> 1155 F Street, NW
>> Suite 1050
>> Washington, DC 20004
>> 202-559-8597/Direct
>> 202-559-8750/Fax
>> 202-255-6172/cell
>>
>> Twitter: @VlawDC
>>
>> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>>
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Edward Morris
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:21 PM
>> To: Adam Peake
>> Cc: Accountability Cross Community
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Advisors joining Istanbul meeting
>>
>> HI Adam,
>>
>> I'd suggest that staff should not be the ones providing "background" to the experts, assuming "background" includes interpretation of substantive subject matter.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Adam Peake <adam.peake at icann.org> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> The advisors asked if they could have their own meeting; to get to know each other, to help them prepare for the sessions on Monday and Tuesday, to consider how they might best support the group while in Istanbul and ongoing. I thought it very reasonable that they should want to do this. I hope it will benefit the CCWG's work in the coming days, and over the next few months.
>>
>> Some questions asked:
>>
>> No, ICANN Board members will not join the advisors meeting on Sunday. Staff will be there, but to provide support/background. The purpose of the meeting is to allow the advisors to be able to talk about the proposals before them from the CCWG, and, I think, essentially to get to know each other.
>>
>> We hadn't envisioned opening the meeting to observers. As it's their first opportunity for them to talk, to hold informal discussions, I think it perhaps helpful if not open. They are trying to prepare themselves for the meetings ahead.
>>
>> Hopefully the Chairs will meet the Advisors later in the day, but this in part depends on travel plans.
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>
>> Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 4:12 PM
>> To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Advisors joining Istanbul meeting
>>
>> I share Keith's concern. Let's remember we are holding ICANN to a high standard of transparency in its accountability processes - so of course that standard of transparency applies to this work as well. I planned to arrive to Istanbul in time to attend any mtgs on Sunday so would like to attend this one as well at least as an observer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Seun,
>>
>> I respectfully disagree.
>>
>> If ICANN staff or Board members are participating in or attending a private planning meeting of the Advisors, then community members should also be invited to observe, at a minimum.
>>
>> If you look at their agenda items 2-5 (especially 2-3), their private meeting will contribute to setting expectations and understanding of the issues. Wouldn’t that be best enabled through participation of CCWG members, or the Co-Chairs at a minimum?
>>
>> In my opinion, it would be inappropriate for ICANN staff and/or Board members to have unique access to the Advisors at this sensitive and formative stage in their engagement with the CCWG.
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 2:19 PM
>> To: Drazek, Keith
>> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org; Adam Peake
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Advisors joining Istanbul meeting
>>
>> Hi,
>> While it may be fine to have them meet openly, I don't think it's something to worry about. The reason is because of their role being advisory; one would expect that whatever they determine would still be forwarded to ccwg as an advice to consider.
>> Regards
>> sent from Google nexus 4
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>> On 18 Mar 2015 19:09, "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> Will any ICANN staff or Board members participate in or attend the private meeting of the Advisors?
>>
>> Is there a reason their meeting is not open to observers?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Keith
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Adam Peake
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 2:04 PM
>> To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Advisors joining Istanbul meeting
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Three of the Advisors will attend the CCWG meeting on Monday and Tuesday next week:
>>
>> Valerie D'Costa, Jan Scholte and Lee Bygrave
>> (https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Advisors)
>>
>> They arrive on Saturday and will hold their own meeting on Sunday morning and early afternoon. At least one other member, Willie Currie, will join remote.
>>
>> This is the first time any of them will have had chance to meet face to face. Tentative agenda for their meeting:
>>
>> 09:00 - 15:00 local Istanbul (07:00 - 13:00 UTC)
>>
>> 1. Introduction & Opening Remarks
>> 2. Topics of interest & Concerns
>> 3. Understanding the context and recent developments 4. How can we help the CCWG?
>> 5. Preparing for CCWG session
>> 6. A.O.B
>>
>> They will receive the same documents as all members of the CCWG, and we suspect their discussions will be shaped by those (WP1, WP2, stress test work party outcomes)
>>
>> They will join the welcome cocktail.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> Adam Peake
>>
>> ICANN
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4306/9294 - Release Date: 03/13/15
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4306/9294 - Release Date: 03/13/15
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> InternetNZ
>
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
>
> A better world through a better Internet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150319/acfc3322/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150319/acfc3322/signature.asc>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list