[CCWG-ACCT] Template for IRP in advance of Istanbul

[Jacob Malthouse]

Thanks Becky,

Some questions for consideration, apologies if these have already been
considered by the group:

1. Would panel decisions have precedential value?

2. What would happen if timeframe requirements were not met?

3. How are third parties considered, and conversely, would emergency relief
proceedings be required to stay a decision or process?

4. Could an expedited process exist (the ICDR rules currently provide for
this)?

5. Would a pre-mediation process be advised/required (e.g. CEP and/or as
outlined in the ICDR rules)?

6. What summary dismissal provisions exist and when could these be invoked?

Best, Jacob


Jacob Malthouse
Co-founder & Director, Big Room Inc.
778-960-6527
http://www.bigroom.ca/

On 20 March 2015 at 08:42, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz> wrote:

>   Dear CCWG-ACCT -
>
>  I’ve attached a draft accountability mechanism template for a
> revised/enhanced Independent Review.  Many thanks to those on the
> Independent Review working group who put this together!  You will notice
> that the template includes lots of questions and alternatives to be
> discussed in Istanbul.
>
>  Best,
> Becky
>
>  J. Beckwith Burr
>
> *Neustar, Inc. /* Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
>
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
>
> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
> becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150320/362123bf/attachment.html>