[CCWG-ACCT] Meeting with CCWG Advisors

[Arun Sukumar]

Valerie D'Costa, an advisor to the CCWG, raised a couple of interesting and
important questions on process and substance. I hope this is a faithful
reproduction.

On process:

1. What should be the role of advisors? Should they offer advice on the
basis of unanimity or "rough consensus", or just provide input
independently?

2. Should advisors restrict their role to responding to questions that have
been flagged by the CCWG and routed through the chairs? Or should they/ can
they flag issues they feel are important - weighed from their expertise.

On substance:

1. How is the accountability process taking stock of the evolving "global
internet community", given that it is going to be driven by numbers from
the  developing world?

2. Taking off from Q1, is the CCWG evaluating the future capacity of ICANN
to be truly representative in the years to come?

arun

-- 
-
@arunmsukumar <http://www.twitter.com/arunmsukumar>
Senior Fellow, Centre for Communication Governance <http://www.ccgdelhi.org>
National Law University, New Delhi
Ph: +91-9871943272
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150322/b53c7478/attachment.html>