[CCWG-ACCT] Public Comments

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi Robin, all

I don't think the current timeline proposes 20days. It proposes 40days
public comment and another 21days period for SO/AC(the chartering
organisations). Perhaps having the 40 days divided in phases could help.
However I think the other 21days is also sufficient enough to get more
comments in after the initial update.

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 22 Mar 2015 17:29, "Robin Gross" <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> I agree with Kavouss.  I think it would be terribly irresponsible of us to
> make the kind of reforms we need for WS1 with only one single 20-day
> comment period.  There are significant impacts to these measures that must
> be explored by the community before we could possibly undertake them.  We
> are redesigning a global governance institution and need to take the time
> to do it right, which includes community consultation and an iterative
> process of reaching recommendations.  This cannot be achieved without a
> reply or 2nd comment period to take the public comments on board.  Nor can
> it be done before we have independent legal advice that the community can
> weigh and consider.  These are complex issues with significant implications
> for many stakeholders - more significant than anything ICANN has done in a
> decade.
>
> Larry Strickling has said several times that 30 Sept is not a deadline and
> that the IANA contract would be extended while the community takes the
> necessary time to get the important issues right.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>
> Dear Jordan,
> Dear Co Chairs
> Dear All,
> I think one public comment is not sufficient , Why for such an important
> issue only one period is forseen unless we are of the strong view that one
> dialogue between CCWG and the entire community is enough,in particular, for
> WS2 as the scope , nature and extent of that stream  is too complex .
> We need to revisit this item again.
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2015-03-22 16:57 GMT+01:00 Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz>:
>
>> It's important to be clear that the current schedule proposes:
>>
>> ONE public comment period for WorkStream 1 matters (pre-transition)
>>
>> ONE public comment period for WorkStream 2 matters (post-transition)
>>
>> It remains to be seen whether it is possible to construct our
>> pre-transition proposal based on one comment period - hopefully this will
>> be clear by Tuesday afternoon.
>>
>> bests
>> Jordan
>>
>>
>> On 22 March 2015 at 17:51, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Kavouss,
>>>
>>> According to the timeline, there seem to be two 40 days public comments
>>> planned for the ccwg.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150129/c9bfee6e/ICG-CWG-CCWG_timeline_20150129-0001.pdf
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> sent from Google nexus 4
>>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>> On 22 Mar 2015 13:27, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>> May somebody kindly mention how many public comments are foreseen and
>>>> what are the period(s) deadline for comments
>>>> It is important that atleast two public comments to be foreseen each
>>>> with atleast 21 days response period
>>>> KAVOUSS
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jordan Carter
>>
>> Chief Executive
>> *InternetNZ*
>>
>> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
>> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> Skype: jordancarter
>>
>> *A better world through a better Internet *
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150322/043621c4/attachment.html>