[CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG)

[Jordan Carter]

The only thing I would like to add at this point is to query the point
about granting such rights to individual SOs and ACs.

The rights of a member, which we are analogising, would have given the
inspection right to the community mechanism as sole member. The right would
not have been able to be delegated to SOs and ACs in a legal sense. It was
the abstraction of that right *away* from individual SOs and ACs, along
with other statutory rights, which was part of the shift from multiple
members to single members.

It is not clear to me why we should, in WS1, do anything other than
replicate what the member right would have been - to grant it to the
community as a whole, as would have been the case with membership.

For the rest, it should be WS2....


cheers
Jordan


On 3 November 2015 at 10:24, Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>
wrote:

> Hence, my suggestion to focus on more defined, easily implemented measures
> in WS1 that would address the concerns of those calling for more
> transparency measures in WS1, while leaving the more complicated matters to
> WS2 with a specific commitment to follow through.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Brett Schaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security
> and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org
>
> *From:* Burr, Becky [mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 02, 2015 4:22 PM
>
> *To:* Schaefer, Brett; Steve DelBianco; kdrazek at verisign.com; Alan
> Greenberg
> *Cc:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on
> Transparency Reforms for CCWG)
>
>
>
> Agree, but our time constraints are significant
>
>
>
> J. Beckwith Burr
>
> Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<Schaefer>, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>
> *Date: *Monday, November 2, 2015 at 4:20 PM
> *To: *Becky Burr <becky.burr at neustar.biz>, Steve DelBianco <
> sdelbianco at netchoice.org>, Keith Drazek <kdrazek at verisign.com>, Alan
> Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> *Cc: *Accountability Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> *Subject: *RE: [CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on
> Transparency Reforms for CCWG)
>
>
>
> Becky,
>
>
>
> I am referring to the more recent discussion that arose form the move from
> membership to designator. Even so, there is no opposition expressed that I
> have seen to the pursuit of these goals in principle, just in terms of our
> time constraints.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Brett
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *BrettSchaefer*
>
> * Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security
> and Foreign Policy*
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__heritage.org_&d=CwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=ns0EKaZMgPYtzk_eoqXWtkY71iI_xOFXK_CY5TLfgSY&s=2L5fXhaVij06ISnz3kqV5AkYb_p2E-QIRZmpKMBJVS0&e=>
>
> *From:* Burr, Becky [mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz
> <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz>]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 02, 2015 3:44 PM
> *To:* Schaefer, Brett; Steve DelBianco; kdrazek at verisign.com; Alan
> Greenberg
> *Cc:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on
> Transparency Reforms for CCWG)
>
>
>
> Review and enhancement of DIDP has been a WS2 item for months.
>
>
>
>
>
> J. Beckwith Burr
>
> Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<Schaefer>, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>
> *Date: *Monday, November 2, 2015 at 1:06 PM
> *To: *Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>, Keith Drazek <
> kdrazek at verisign.com>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> *Cc: *Accountability Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on
> Transparency Reforms for CCWG)
>
>
>
> That said, in the general discussion, I haven’t seen any real opposition
> to the call for: (1) granting the right of inspection to the SD or to the
> individual SOs/ACs; (2) improving the DIDP process; and (3) requiring ICANN
> to disclose its contacts with government to influence policy and the
> expenditures for that purpose.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>


-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

+64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter
Web: www.internetnz.nz

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151103/52d7d00f/attachment.html>