[CCWG-ACCT] proposed language for Mission statement on contract enforcement

[Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez]

Certainly!

this is another memorable piece on regulation by some At large members back in the times of ATRT2

http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-02apr13/msg00004.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-02apr13/msg00004.html>

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
_____________________

email: carlosraulg at gmail.com
Skype: carlos.raulg
+506 8837 7176 (cel)
+506 4000 2000 (home)
+506 2290 3678 (fax)
_____________________
Apartado 1571-1000
San Jose, COSTA RICA

> On Nov 3, 2015, at 2:15 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:
> 
> I too seem to recall seeing in early NTIA (or other) documents
> somewhere that ICANN was to be considered a regulator.
> 
> el
> 
> On 2015-11-03 08:37, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
>> Well, they are entitled to their opinion, but historically, they are
>> mistaken.
>> 
>> That was the basis on which the EU bought into the ICANN concept
>> in the first place.
>> Also there is clear precedent that ICANN has acted as a
>> 'regulator' of the DNS market.  e.g. structural separation, price
>> cap, conditions of Registrar competition, etc.
>> 
>> CW
>> 
>> On 03 Nov 2015, at 07:18, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I don't disagree with you Christopher.
>>> 
>>> But some people would like to avoid considering ICANN a regulator
>>> or self-regulator more broadly, which I think it can be
>>> classified as.
>>> 
> [...]
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151103/2fc6e724/attachment.html>