[CCWG-ACCT] WP2 Issues from last night's call

[Malcolm Hutty]

On 03/11/2015 15:13, Burr, Becky wrote:
> I’ve attached a revised deck trying to lay out our conclusions from last
> night.

Becky,

I regret I wasn't aware of a meeting last night. Moreover, this message
just arrived, and crossed with my reply to your message to Andrew
immediately previously.

Regarding the chapeau, if your proposed resolution works for the IAB (as
I suspect it will), then I am content, and my previous message of a few
moments ago can be disregarded.

Regarding the "contracting" issue, I can accept adding the preliminary
language "In service of its Mission". I cannot accept Greg's alternative
suggestion "Notwithstanding the foregoing"; that would mean that the
following statement completely supercedes and overrides the statement of
there being a limited Mission.

If you need any further explanation of why the purple "notwithstanding
the foregoing" is a non-starter, I can provide voluminous references to
responses to public comment, and a comparison with the ISPCP statement
issued in Dublin. I hope this will not be necessary, and that we can all
agree on "In service of the Mission".

Malcolm.
-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
       Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA