[CCWG-ACCT] Defending and Protecting Work Stream 2

Jordan Carter jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Tue Nov 3 23:14:00 UTC 2015


hi Bruce, all

Bruce: is the Board prepared to accept the existence of WS2 and to honor
it? The public comments on the second draft report indicated no. If there
has been an acceptance of the need to complete the project, that would be
helpful to know.

thanks
Jordan


On 3 November 2015 at 22:47, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
wrote:

> Hello Brett,
>
>
>
>
>
> >>  On the first point, is there a way to put in a time limit for Board
> consideration after the community settles on its recommendations?
>
>
>
> I would expect about 14 days.
>
>
>
> >> Also, what is the threshold for the Board to reject the WS2
> recommendations?
>
>
>
> Same as Work stream 1 – 2/3 vote to reject and then dialogue to resolve
> issues.   See resolution from Los Angles in 2014.
>
>
>
> >>  Are the recommendations piecemeal or tied together?
>
>
>
> Up to the CCWG.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>


-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

+64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter
Web: www.internetnz.nz

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151104/53e41ecb/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list