[CCWG-ACCT] WP2 Issues from last night's call

[Alan Greenberg]

In the regulatory section, I would still like to see language that 
explicitly says that the unique identifiers themselves are deemed to 
not be "content".

What is the status of the two sections where "Where feasible and 
appropriate" had been deleted in the August proposal?

Alan

At 03/11/2015 10:13 AM, Burr, Becky wrote:
>I've attached a revised deck trying to lay out our conclusions from 
>last night.
>
>1.  We concluded to resolve the support/coordinate problem by 
>eliminating the chapeau in the Mission Statement.  See Slide 1 and 
>the side-by-side document
>2.  Kavouss strongly urged us to modify the language of the 
>regulatory preclusion.  I have taken a shot at that in purple in the 
>side-by-side document
>3.  Greg Shatan proposed a modification to the contracting language 
>also reflected in purple on slide 2
>4.  We agreed to put transparency points 1 and 2 in WS1 and to 
>address points 3 and 4 as part of WS2.
>
>Becky
>
>
>J. Beckwith Burr
>Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community