[CCWG-ACCT] WP2 Issues from last night's call

[Malcolm Hutty]

On 04/11/2015 22:06, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Becky and all,
> 
> I have attached a revision to the proposed Bylaw under discussion,
> taking the comments from various quarters into account and trying to
> balance various concerns.
> 
> Greg

Thank you Greg. I think "strictly" should remain; the intent is indeed
to ensure that ICANN remains within the Mission, and who is to say what
kind of mission creep is "harmless".

Your text also helpfully points out the unhelpfully vague nature of the
phrase "as reasonably appropriate" in the first sentence. Let's delete it.

I can agree with the inclusion of "negotiate and enter into", provided
that this is also within the Mission.

Attached is my suggestion for how we incorporate that phrase.

The attached text is much simpler and more clear than anything we have
had so far. If it is used, I think you will agree that there can be no
suggestion nor any reasonable fear that ICANN's legitimate contracting
authority is being brought into question.

Can we settle on this?

Malcolm.

-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
       Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mission contracts text MSAH 20151104.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 14057 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151104/329b6107/MissioncontractstextMSAH20151104.docx>