[CCWG-ACCT] Work Stream 2 - Board position

[Phil Corwin]

Likewise. Without assurance that the CCWG will persist to pursue WS2 accountability matters there is a high likelihood of dissipation of focused effort and mission failure.

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell

Twitter: @VlawDC
 
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey


-----Original Message-----
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Wilson, Christopher
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 11:05 AM
To: Malcolm Hutty; Nigel Roberts; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Work Stream 2 - Board position

Agree.

-----Original Message-----
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Malcolm Hutty
Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 6:32 AM
To: Nigel Roberts; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Work Stream 2 - Board position



On 05/11/2015 19:59, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> I find this helpful. Well done.
> 
> I do have some small reservations about the final para which reads 
> "May we therefore ask the Board to formally commit to honoring WS2 
> recommendations?"
> 
> They can commit all they like. But what matters is whether there is 
> any enforceability (to borrow a term from a source I respect) should a 
> future Board not live up to the committments of the present Board.
> 
> So I would hope the Board would answer with HOW they would guarantee 
> their commitment (which, in good faith, I believe to be indubitable

Actually, I think the point that has been brought into question is not whether the Board commit nor whether it is enforceable, but whether that line of work would be pursued through the CCWG or whether it will be dispersed.

Concerns have been expressed that dispersal will result in dissipation, and that closing the CCWG will remove the only or most effective mechanism to pursue WS2. Previously, we believe we had assurance that
WS2 would continue; more recently, the Board has introduced a suggestion that that might not be the case.

So what we should be seeking to have confirmed is the Board's commitment that this CCWG may continue to exist for the purpose of developing plans and overseeing the implementation of WS2, and that the Board will continue to co-operate with the CCWG during that process.

Malcolm.

-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog  London Internet Exchange | https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__publicaffairs.linx.net_&d=CwICAg&c=QCEPhmH9WJ8wFC_LYDIWIQ&r=_yIH0j711TdLk87MBYWQ4A&m=uSd-Wscbrow4bq_dloRttMC92IEpjw-qJOCbz0lDvEc&s=o28bEyuKN1gjXoOnaSM3PxlGv7hp431MDbiV6RYObWA&e= 

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
       Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwICAg&c=QCEPhmH9WJ8wFC_LYDIWIQ&r=_yIH0j711TdLk87MBYWQ4A&m=uSd-Wscbrow4bq_dloRttMC92IEpjw-qJOCbz0lDvEc&s=5TzyM6-LGnJWLgRp67V1ybQy2anZvKBH8v3noEa3kE0&e=
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4450/10889 - Release Date: 10/25/15 Internal Virus Database is out of date.