[CCWG-ACCT] regulatory/mission issue WS2

[arun.sukumar at orfonline.org]

> First, deletion at this late date would create a very unfortunate drafting
> record.  Deletion at the end of the process would be presumed by an
> independent arbiter to have some intent and meaning and I greatly fear that
> the inference would be drawn that we intended to negate the substantive
> restriction.

Agree with Paul - the inference is quite worrying, and sends the message that the CCWG has had second thoughts on ICANN's role re: regulation.

Arun