[CCWG-ACCT] Work Stream 2 - Board position

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All,
Sorry be late,
I fully support Nigle, and many other that commented on the last paragraph.
Some thing ehich is missing is the strong relation and dependency of the
actions to be taken Under work Stream 2 as discussed and determined almost
extensively and carefully .
There is a missing part in the letter send to indicate that should the
activities forseen Under WS2 is not executed/ performed it would have
adverse impact on several ietem which are being contained in the
recommendations of WS1.
>From Board's submission to LA ,it is clear that the Board intends to
integrate WORK Stream 2 IN ITS DAY TO DAY ACTIVITIES WITHOUT BEING FORMALLY
FOLLOWED AS ENVISAGED BY CCWG.
Moreover the extent to which the forseen actions will be forfomed as well
as the time frame for that is totally unclear.
I also agree the commimment given by current Board may not be pursued by
the future fBoard that many important elelement of post transition
accountability will be on the air with  no desteny
Kavouss

2015-11-07 2:14 GMT+01:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:

> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 05/11/2015 19:59, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>> > I find this helpful. Well done.
>>
>> So what we should be seeking to have confirmed is the Board's commitment
>> that this CCWG may continue to exist for the purpose of developing plans
>> and overseeing the implementation of WS2, and that the Board will continue
>> to co-operate with the CCWG during that process.
>>
>
> I personally don't think the CCWG must be the team to carry out all the
> work set in WS2. If there are other ways to efficiently diversify and embed
> the activities in other community processes without distorting the
> task/objectives then that will be good. Certainly there are specification
> work that the CCWG should no doubt provide but it doesn't have to be CCWG
> that will develop the details(and CCWG could just perform general
> oversight). Unless the CCWG thinks that the community members(which i
> expect will again involve some of the current CCWG members) that would be
> involved in the other processes will not do a good job.
>
> Regards
>
>>
>> Malcolm.
>>
>> --
>>             Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
>>    Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
>>  London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
>>
>>                  London Internet Exchange Ltd
>>        Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
>>
>>          Company Registered in England No. 3137929
>>        Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt
> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151107/3ea40958/attachment-0001.html>