[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Executive Summary
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Nov 10 02:52:39 UTC 2015
Comment after a first pass (pages 1-17):
Page 8 and later: I believe that using the term "Sole Designator" to
describe the full set of powers is misleading (as perhaps the Sole
Member was, although not as obvious). The term designator is a legal
term related only to appointing or removing directors. That power is
given to the SOs, one AC and the NomCom (for appointment). The other
community powers need to be exercised through a UA, but not
necessarily the "designator", and using that term will imply to some
that the powers are ALL held only by those that appoint directors.
Page 8: Stress tests do not "ensure" SS&R. They help identify
potential SS&R problems or validate that they are not present.
Page 9: Under the current Bylaws, no Public Comment is necessary
before Bylaw changes. That is something that the Board does
voluntarily. The only Bylaw requirement is that amendments be passed
by 2/3 of all sitting directors. (Properly documented on page 17.)
Page 10, line 5. It is inaccurate to say the sole designator gives
the "maximum" amount of powers. It is described later in the page
correctly as giving a reasonable set of powers consistent with requirements.
Page 11, 5th bullet, 2nd "or" should be an "and".
Page 12, bullet 1, sub-bullet 2. I don't think that "singing"
contracts would be much of problem, although perhaps signing
contracts could. Joking aside, the only resolutions that we are
talking about rejecting are approving budgets and amending Bylaws, so
contracts are not an issue.
Page 12, I think it is deranged to think we could schedule and
organize a face-to-face meeting of ACs and SOs in 15 days.
Page 16, "The Power ..." title, Strategic instead of Strategy.
Page 16, My recollection is that a budget or plan could only be
rejected based on an issue that was raised during the consultative
process. I think this is an important aspect and should be mentioned
in this paper.
Alan
At 09/11/2015 04:42 PM, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
>All,
>
>Please find attached the first full draft of the executive summary
>which will be discussed on the call tomorrow.
>
>Apologies for the delay in getting this out but people have been
>working almost around the clock.
>
>Bernard Turcotte
>Staff Support
>
>for the co-chairs.
>Content-Type: application/pdf; name="Summary of the Work and Recommendations"
> of the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN
> Accountability-0.8ToCCWG.pdf"
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Summary of the Work and"
> Recommendations of the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN
> Accountability-0.8ToCCWG.pdf"
>X-Attachment-Id: f_igsh55bg0
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list