[CCWG-ACCT] comment: CCWG - Executive Summary

Dr. Tatiana Tropina t.tropina at mpicc.de
Tue Nov 10 13:54:34 UTC 2015


Hello
I already made a comment on the chat during CCWG call today, making it
here again.
I think the human rights language in the summary is a bit confusing.
"Reinforcing Adherence to Human Rights Protocols" (pages 7, 8, 31) is
not exactly what WP4 proposed. The word "protocols" makes no sense in
this context, it will be good either for diplomatic language or for
IETF, but not for the CCWG document. As far as I am concerned, we are
not suggesting to commit to any "protocols", furthermore, we even
decided not to suggest to mention any instruments. Even within the
context of international human rights law mentioning "protocols" doesn't
make any sense.
I believe just "human rights" or "internationally recognised human
rights" would be much better wording. But not "protocols" because it is
confusing.
Best regards
Tanya

On 09/11/15 22:42, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
> All,
>
> Please find attached the first full draft of the executive summary
> which will be discussed on the call tomorrow.
>
> Apologies for the delay in getting this out but people have been
> working almost around the clock.
>
> Bernard Turcotte
> Staff Support
>
> for the co-chairs.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151110/9f67e3b1/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list