[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Executive Summary
Nigel Roberts
nigel at channelisles.net
Tue Nov 10 16:14:01 UTC 2015
>> were discussing respect for human rights, not adherence. And where did
>> the protocols come in? We should revert to the agreed HR text.
There is no agreed text.
You have very significant objections to the evisceration of ICANN's
obligations from me and Eberhard Lisse as a start.
But I agree that 'protocols' play no part in it. What are they, in this
context, anyway?
I come back to my original point which has been widely and studiously
ignored.
If we do NOT refer to a lowest-common denominator baseline such as the
UDHR, then a vague reference to 'human rights' could be used to include
all sorts of things we don't mean, such as the right to water, or the
right to internet access (both of which have been described as human
rights).
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list