[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Executive Summary

[Nigel Roberts]

>> were discussing respect for human rights, not adherence. And where did
>> the protocols come in? We should revert to the agreed HR text.

There is no agreed text.

You have very significant objections to the evisceration of ICANN's 
obligations from me and Eberhard Lisse as a start.

But I agree that 'protocols' play no part in it. What are they, in this 
context, anyway?

I come back to my original point which has been widely and studiously 
ignored.

If we do NOT refer to a lowest-common denominator baseline such as the 
UDHR, then a vague reference to 'human rights' could be used to include 
all sorts of things we don't mean, such as the right to water, or the 
right to internet access (both of which have been described as human 
rights).