[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Executive Summary

Stephen Deerhake sdeerhake at nic.as
Tue Nov 10 21:38:06 UTC 2015


+1 for Nigel's remarks.
Stephen Deerhake

-----Original Message-----
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nigel
Roberts
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:14 AM
To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Executive Summary



>> were discussing respect for human rights, not adherence. And where 
>> did the protocols come in? We should revert to the agreed HR text.

There is no agreed text.

You have very significant objections to the evisceration of ICANN's
obligations from me and Eberhard Lisse as a start.

But I agree that 'protocols' play no part in it. What are they, in this
context, anyway?

I come back to my original point which has been widely and studiously
ignored.

If we do NOT refer to a lowest-common denominator baseline such as the UDHR,
then a vague reference to 'human rights' could be used to include all sorts
of things we don't mean, such as the right to water, or the right to
internet access (both of which have been described as human rights).
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list