[CCWG-ACCT] Stress Test 18: bylaw amendment suggestion

[Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch]

Dear Avri

As far as I understand it, ther

Von meinem iPhone gesendet

> Am 11.11.2015 um 00:37 schrieb Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
> 
> 
> 
> On 09-Nov-15 11:28, Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva wrote:
> 
> */_if not followed, requires finding mutually agreed solutions for
> implementation of that advice_/*
> 
> The current bylaws state:
> 
>> The Governmental Advisory Committee and the ICANN Board will then try,
>> in good faith and in a timely and efficient manner, to find a mutually
>> acceptable solution.
> 
> 
> I am wondering whether the the words 'try , in good faith and in a
> timely and efficient manner, ' were accidentally dropped from the newly
> proposed formulation.
> 
> Form my perspective there is a world of difference between requiring a
> genuine attempt to find a mutually acceptable solution and the
> requirement for finding one.
> 
> In one case if the attempt fails, the Board is still free to make a  to
> reject the advice.  In the later, the Board seems bound to find a
> mutually agreed upon solution without the abilty to reject the advice if
> no such solution can be found.
> 
> Can someone clarify this for me?  I accept that having missed a few
> meeting lately, my understanding may be lagging, but that is my reason
> for returning to the proposed and existing language.
> 
> thanks
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community