[CCWG-ACCT] Stress Test 18: bylaw amendment suggestion

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Notwithstanding the transparency concerns this suggestion offers, it
is more evidence that even the authors of the CCWG proposal don't
understand it themselves.

el

On 2015-11-11 14:35, Megan.Richards at ec.europa.eu wrote:
> Let's find a moment to clarify orally instead of flooding all
> others with these exchanges and I rather suspect trying their
> patience
> 
> Sent from my iPhone.  Please excuse any typing errors
> 
>> On 11 Nov 2015, at 07:27, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ok, I remain confused.
>>
>> Are you saying that if they call their advice 'consensus advice'
>> it can apply if they claim that status, but otherwise it doesn't?
>>
>> Please forgive me for my inability to truly understand what is
>> being proposed.  Perhaps I have been supporting the notion of
>> equal footing in multistakeholder process for too long to
>> understand some of the nuances.
>>
>> avri
[...]

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/