[CCWG-ACCT] Attempt to summarize discussion regarding Mission and Contract

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 18:55:37 UTC 2015


I am trying to get to a concrete and shared understanding of what this
proposal means when it says "services."  Based on the varying responses in
this and earlier threads, we're not there yet.

Greg

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>
wrote:

> I agree with Prof. Müller.
>
> We must endeavour to be technology and implementation neutral despite the
> fact that ICANN is built on a specific, Port 53, protocol.
>
>
>
> On 11/11/2015 06:19 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
>> Greg:
>>
>> Alas, it is not an accurate formulation. It is far too specific, invokes
>> technologies that may be superseded or not conform to future
>> architectures, etc. What does it mean to regulate a “web server” anyway?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151111/ccb53a04/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list