[CCWG-ACCT] Do we need a unified post-transition IANA?

[James Gannon]

Agree with Andrew, the CWG was/is the place for such discussions not the CCWG.

-Jg




On 16/11/2015, 1:49 p.m., "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Andrew Sullivan" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

>On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:08:22PM +0000, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>> In my view, the reason this has been resisted, is that the ICANN
>> Establishment would see this as a threat to the larger 'empire' it has
>> created.
>
>I'm not really sure why this list is the correct place to discuss
>post-transition arrangements for IANA -- even for names -- given that
>ICANN has a whole working group talking about that very topic.
>
>Best regards,
>
>A
>
>-- 
>Andrew Sullivan
>ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community